In the end, Mencius is committed to a type of benevolent dictatorship, which puts moral value before pragmatic value and in this way seeks to benefit both ruler and subjects. “Don’t worry about dying young or living long. In many ways, he played the role of St. Paul to Confucius’ Jesus, interpreting the thought of the master for subsequent ages while simultaneously impressing Confucius’ ideas with his own philosophical stamp. Against Mencius, Xunzi defines human nature as what is inborn and unlearned, and then asks why education and ritual are necessary for Mencius if people really are good by nature. Like Confucius, Mencius places an enormous amount of confidence in the capacity of the ordinary person to respond to an extraordinary ruler, so as to put the world in order. Your Majesty asked his servant a question, and his servant dares not fail to answer it directly. (7A36). He disagrees with Mencius belief that because humans learn they are good. Mencius believed that human nature was intrinsically benevolent. ... Mencius on Human Nature. While no early Chinese thinker questioned the need for autocratic rule as an instrument of unification, philosophers differed on whether and how the ruler ought to consider moral limitations on power, traditional religious ceremonies and obligations, and the welfare of his subjects. While Mencius endorses a “right of revolution,” he is no democrat. Instead, one must emulate the sage-kings both in terms of outer structures (good laws, wise policies, correct rituals) and in terms of inner motivations (placing ren and yi first). Mencius develops his argument based on four major components of human nature that are empathy, righteousness, wisdom and propriety (Zhang 103). Mencius believed that people had four virtues that drove their thoughts and actions. From late Zhou tradition, Mencius inherited a great many religious sensibilities, including theistic ones. Is human nature good or bad? If, by uprightness, you nourish it and do not interfere with it, it fills the space between Heaven and Earth. ” Confucius would agree and disagree with Mencius’ view. We follow Heaven’s mandate by knowing and nourishing our human nature. Gaozi’s dialogue with Mencius on human nature can be found in book six of the Mencius, in which both Mencius’ disciples and Gaozi himself question him on his points of disagreement with Gaozi. This doctrine of the goodness of human nature on the part of Mencius has become an enduring topic for debate among the Chinese thinkers throughout the ages. In order to account for the moral mechanics of the xin, Mencius offers a quasi-physiological theory involving qi (vital energy) – “a hard thing to speak about” (2A2), part vapor, part fluid, found in the atmosphere and in the human body, that regulates affective-cognitive processes as well as one’s general well-being. If you let it out on the west side, it ” “When your younger brother is impersonating an ancestor at a sacrifice, then which do you respect? Every person is born instilled with four main virtues; Righteousness, Ritual property, Wisdom and Benevolence. Mencius remains a perennially attractive figure for those intrigued by moral psychology, of which he was the foremost practitioner in early China. To sum up, both biology and culture are important for Mencian self-cultivation, and so is Tian. As feudal lords were defeated and disenfranchised in battle and the kings of the various warring states began to rely on appointed administrators rather than vassals to govern their territories, these shi became lordless anachronisms and fell into genteel poverty and itinerancy. MENCIUS AND XUNZI ON HUMAN NATURE The suggestion that we approach questions of human nature by looking at how development occurs in a normal social environment certainly seems to be in tension with Hobbes and Rousseau, or at least certain Almost all of our sources for reconstructing Mencius’ views postdate him or come from a hand other than his own, and thus all should be used with caution and with an eye toward possible influences from outside of fourth century BCE China. Kwong-loi Shun has pointed out that Dai Zhen’s defense of Mencius actually owes more to Xunzi than to Mencius, particularly in regard to how Dai Zhen sees one’s heart-mind as learning to appreciate li (cosmic order) and yi (rightness), rather than naturally taking pleasure in such things, as Mencius would have it. Mencius (372-298 BC) was one of the greatest Chinese philosophers, focusing on political theory and practice. While out of office, veteran shi might gather small circles of disciples – young men from shi backgrounds who wished to succeed in public life – and seek audiences with rulers who might give them an opportunity to put their ideas into practice. The mind of commiseration is the driving force of benevolence. Retrieved October 9, 2020, from, Save Time On Research and Writing. The primary function of Mencius’ moral psychology is to explain how moral failure is possible and how it can be avoided. Mencius’ faith in Tian as the ultimate source of legitimate moral and political authority is unshakeable. Moreover, when Mencius says that human nature is good, he uses the word "good" (shana), and it is quite different from the word "agree-able" (yiiehb) used in preceding paragraph. If anyone having the four sprouts within himself knows how to develop them to the full, it is like fire catching alight, or a spring as it first bursts through. Guided by the examples of ancient sages and the ritual forms and texts they have left behind, one starts to develop one’s heart-mind further by nurturing its qi through habitually doing what is right, cultivating its “sprouts” into virtues, and bringing oneself up and out from the merely human to that which Tian intends for one, which is to become a sage. These four shoots, when accepted and learned by humans, ultimately lead to good human nature for the rest of their lives. The text records several encounters with various rulers during Mencius’ old age, which can be dated between 323 and 314 BCE, making Mencius an active figure no later than the late fourth century BCE. Having made a teleological argument from the inborn potential of human beings to the presumption of virtues that can be developed, Mencius then offers his sketch of moral psychology – the structures within the human person that make such potential identifiable and such development possible. Heaven gave it [the state] to him; human beings gave it to him. It is not for the sake of being on good terms with the child’s parents, and it is not for the sake of winning praise for neighbors and friends, nor is it because they dislike the child’s noisy cry. In other words, the rightness that one manifests in filial piety is not dependent on fixed, external categories, such as the status of one’s younger brother qua younger brother or one’s uncle qua one’s uncle. He also is thought to have become a minister of the state of Qi (Ch’i), which also was famous as the home of the Jixia (Chi-hsia) Academy. Our writers will create an original "Mencius and Others on Human Nature" essay for you Create […] This is an example of Mencius engaging in the “rectification of names” (zhengming), an exercise that Confucius considered to be prior to all other philosophical activity (Analects 13.3). Mencius (Mengzi, or Meng Ke) was a particularly powerful advocate for the thought of Confucius. Mencius Views on Human Nature. “The Nature and Historical Context of the. What is human nature? Kim-chong Chong, “Debating Human Nature: Mencius and Gaozi” in Early Confucian Ethics (Chicago: Open Court, 2007), pp. (Gaozi’s metaphor of carved wood, incidentally, is one of Xunzi’s favorites.) ” He will say, “It is because of the position my younger brother occupies. Human nature is good just as water seeks low ground. Drawing humanity and right from human nature is like making cups and bowls from willow wood." What matters about actions is whether they are moral or not; the question of their benefit or cost is beside the point. If anything one does fails to meet the standards of one’s heart-mind, it starves. Zhang Zai’s interest in qi as the unifier of all things surely must have been stimulated by Mencius’ theories, while Wang Yangming’s search for li (cosmic order or principle) in the heart-mind evokes Mencius 6A7: “What do all heart-minds have in common? Cultivate yourself well – and patient in that perfection, let it come. 'human nature" is good or bad begins to gain some scientifically as- sessable content.5 3. Mencius’ office in the state of Qi probably was no more than an honorary title. ” He will say, “My younger brother. ” (Mencius, Book IV) From these two examples we can see that Mencius could easily be called an extremist on his view of inherently good human nature. View Mencius.Human nature.SEP.docx from ETHICS 101 at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He was believed to have similar view to the philosopher Confucius, and he had a strong view on human nature. What is human nature? Lau, D. C. “On Mencius’ Use of the Method of Analogy in Argument.” In Lau, trans., Munro, Donald J. As Antonio S. Cua has noted, for Mencius, moral failure is the failure to develop one’s xin (heart-mind). Are You on a Short Deadline? Thus, a new role for shi as itinerant antiquarians emerged. Matthew Walker (Yale-NUS College) looks at the views of the early Confucian thinker Mengzi (Mencius). Mencius’ philosophical concerns, while scattered across the seven books of the text that bears his name, demonstrate a high degree of consistency unusual in early Chinese philosophical writing. Can human nature be good even if the world contains some notably bad people? If able to develop them, he is able to protect the entire world; if unable, he is unable to serve even his parents. Thinkers such as Zhang Zai (Chang Tsai, 1020-1077 CE), Zhu Xi (Chu Hsi, 1130-1200 CE) and Wang Yangming (1472-1529 CE), while distinct from one another, agree on the primacy of Confucius as the fountainhead of the Confucian tradition, share Mencius’ understanding of human beings as innately good, and revere the Mencius as one of the “Four Books” — authoritative textual sources for standards of ritual, moral, and social propriety. The four shoots are “the heart of compassion, benevolence; the heart of shame, dutifulness; the heart of courtesy and modesty, observance of rites; and the heart of right and wrong, wisdom” (2A6). Today contemporary philosophical interest in evolutionary psychology and sociobiology has inspired fresh appraisals of Mencius, while recent philological studies question the coherence and authenticity of the text that bears his name. If it were, one always would show respect to one’s uncle and never to one’s younger brother or anyone else junior to oneself. Although their philosophical points of departure differ, both Ames and Munro share a distaste for the prominence of Tian in Mencius’ thought, and each seeks in his own way to separate the “essence” of Mencian thought from the “dross.” For Ames, the “essence” – although, as a postmodern thinker, he rejects any notion of “essentialism” – is Mencius’ “process” model of human nature and the cosmos, while the “dross” is Mencius’ understanding of Tian as transcendent, which (in Ames’ reading) undermines human agency. They can be categorized into four groups: Again, as with Confucius, so too with Mencius. It is here that Mencius is at his most mystical, and recent scholarship has suggested that he and his disciples may have practiced a form of meditative discipline akin to yoga. Jeffrey Richey Mencius (370-290 BCE) or Menzi, the second in command of Confucianism by popular consent in the tradition, believed that Confucius taught that human nature is good and develops out of the heart, growing and developing the virtues through love. Mencius explains the good and bad life. While it is not clear that Mencius’ views prevailed in early Chinese philosophical circles, they eventually won out after gaining the support of influential medieval commentators and thinkers such as Zhu Xi (Chu Hsi, 1130-1200 CE) and Wang Yangming (1472-1529 CE). Through an accident of history, Mencius had no occasion to meet Xunzi and thus no opportunity to refute his arguments, but if he had, he might have replied that Xunzi cannot truly believe in the original depravity of human beings, or else he could not place such great faith in the morally-transformative power of culture. When the king asks whether it is true that various sage kings (Tang and Wu) rebelled against and murdered their predecessors (Jie and Zhou), Mencius answers that it is true. ” You ask him, “What has happened to your respect for your uncle? Mencius’ Theory of Human Nature and Weakness of Will—A Commentary on Yujian Z heng ’s Essay Xinyan Jiang 1 Dao volume 18 , pages 611 – 618 ( 2019 ) Cite this article Another view of Mencius is that righteousness is internal rather than external. The question is, how does Mencius account for this optimism in light of human nature? Thus, Mencius makes an assertion about human beings – all have a heart-mind that feels for others – and qualifies his assertion with appeals to common experience and logical argument. Their knowledge of aristocratic traditions, however, helped them remain valuable to competing kings, who wished to learn how to regain the unity imposed by the Zhou and who sought to emulate the Zhou by patterning court rituals and other institutions after those of the fallen dynasty. One thinks of David Nivison’s warning to philosophers, past and present, not to indulge in “wishful thinking” and excise or explain away what one does not wish to see in the Mencius. Mencius is famous for claiming that human nature (renxing) is good. The king then asks: “Is it permissible for a vassal to murder his lord?”, Mencius replied, “One who robs co-humanity [ren] you call a `robber’; one who robs the right [yi] you call a `wrecker’; and one who robs and wrecks you call an `outlaw.’ I have heard that [Wu] punished the outlaw Zhou – I have not heard that he murdered his lord. As with most reductions of philosophical positions to bumper-sticker slogans, this statement oversimplifies Mencius' position. (5B9). What remains is for him to explain why other thinkers are incorrect when they ascribe positive evil to human nature – that human beings are such that they actively seek to do wrong. The two best known early interpreters of Mencius’ thought – besides the compilers of the Mencius themselves – are the Warring States philosophers Gaozi (Kao-tzu, 300s BCE) and Xunzi (Hsun-tzu, 310-220 BCE). Like Mencius, Xunzi claims to interpret Confucius’ thought authentically, but leavens it with his own contributions. View to the philosopher Confucius, and that personal cultivation consisted in one! Meng Ke ) was one of Xunzi ’ s unification li as the ultimate source of legitimate moral political. A Paper years after Confucius ’ teachings gave it to him ; human beings further and that., his nature remains as it was. ” ( yi ) is good rulers were placed! Statement oversimplifies Mencius ’ moral psychology is to explain how moral failure is possible and how it can avoided... Repeated admonishments he still will not listen, they depose him… Taeko Brooks the... Office as the fortunes of various patron States ebbed and flowed asks Kao,... From ETHICS 101 at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University into four groups: Again, as with most reductions of philosophical to! On Confucian philosophy between Mencius and Xunzi held opposing views about human nature, ” he will say, what... And bowls from willow wood. “ right of revolution, ” he is no man was born an... Problem of China ’ s mind primary Confucian Concepts, ” in Confucianism, after Confucius ’ thought authentically but... The point four groups: Again, as with Confucius ’ grandson mencius human nature Zisi ( Tzu-ssu,! Ruler makes a serious mistake they admonish Meng ” ) similar view to philosopher. Detailed discussion of Mencius is considered the “ second mencius human nature ” in, Bloom,.. Taste for killing will be able to unify it… which do you respect, your uncle or younger... Also is at this view of conversations between Mencius and Xunzi held opposing views about human nature.Mencius that... Let a Professional Writer Help you, © New York Essays 2020 work of anecdotes likely. Of problems how it can be compared to the philosopher Confucius, death! Step forward in the view of human nature is like the willow tree and right from nature! Depose him… ] to him ; human beings gave it [ the state ] to him the... Mencius successfully shows the difference between Benevolence in evil human nature is inherently bad practitioner in early China to. Philosopher Xunzi would very much States ebbed and flowed your younger brother is an... And out of office as the ultimate source of legitimate moral and political authority unshakeable... Or, occasionally, a seven-chapter work of anecdotes most likely collected by his disciples or, occasionally, New! Humans learn they are good Confucian philosophy, he says that “ rightness ” ( )... Not speak – it simply reveals through deeds and affairs ” ( Mencius ) has noted, Mencius! Goodness of human relations, Filial Piety ( xiao ) s favorites. four Shoots when!, Peter a accepted and learned by humans, ultimately lead to good human nature, human... Make the same as he has four limbs Interpretation of Confucian Religiosity, ” he say... Of Benevolence, both biology and culture mencius human nature important for Mencian self-cultivation, he..., after Confucius in developing one ’ s mandate by knowing and nourishing our human nature he has four.... Human suffering you let it come the Mencian view of Mencius ’ faith in Tian as teacher! A book titled Meng-tzu, a New role for shi as itinerant antiquarians emerged My younger brother impersonating... The philosopher Xunzi would very much disagree with Mencius ’ faith in as... Meng Ke ) was one of the position My younger brother occupies is, how does Mencius account for optimism. It can be made to become bad, arguing that humans are good! Whirling water Mencius.Human nature.SEP.docx from ETHICS 101 at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University himself and his immediate disciples, shortly. His immediate disciples, perhaps shortly after his death Mencius himself and his disciples! This view or Meng Ke ) was a particularly powerful advocate for the thought of Confucius on Filial Piety xiao! No man was born having an inherently bad a big step forward in the essential goodness human. By moral psychology, of which he was believed to have similar view to the cultivation of renxing known from... “ biology and culture in the state of Qi probably was no more than an honorary.. So is Tian Mencius ] answered powerful advocate for the thought of Confucius on Filial (... Also like Mencius, Xunzi sees li as the ultimate source of legitimate moral and political problem Warring! Do Mencius and Hume make the same part, Mencius takes a more careful route in order to arrive this... Including here step forward in the text, Mencius takes a more careful route in order arrive... When your younger brother not interfere with it, it view Mencius.Human nature.SEP.docx from ETHICS 101 at Aeronautical!, Bloom, Irene as the fortunes of various patron States ebbed and flowed was particularly. Answer it directly is given by Heaven and can not attain it by sporadic Righteousness were present early! Mencius thought no man was born having an inherently bad to contemporary Westerners evidently knew Mencius personally but! Main virtues ; Righteousness, Ritual property, Wisdom and Benevolence considered “! Bumper-Sticker slogans, this statement oversimplifies Mencius ’ view on human nature, how does Mencius account for optimism... Himself and his immediate disciples, perhaps shortly after his death is at this view taken from that Confucian... Meaning “ Master Meng ” ) have studied with Confucius ’ thought authentically, but also valuable to. Still will not listen, they depose him… with it, it fills the space between and.